Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 07/22/2001 - 18:00

The reason most likely is not realizing that there were other avenues. Marketing for an event like this is much different than for a local event...one cannot simply "scale - up" the effort. The real problem is not of the volunteer organizers, an overworked few that struggled to pull it together all of the planned events and facilities. It is the lack of real help that was missing of which they had to do basic hard work that takes more than a 10-minute phone call once a week. Part of that help, such as the marketing of the event, requires a focused and knowledgable effort which can be pretty difficult when you're busy taking care of registrations, making sure that there are sufficient head counts to pay for certain events, and reorganizing events when numbers become more than expected.

What we need to walk away with after this year is being smarter of what is needed for the next biennial challenge in terms of marketing the event. I'm sure that those responsible for this year's event learned many things that they wish they did differently... most notably, not volunteering to organize it :) This website and forum helps in that respect. When many can contribute ideas as how to make the next event better, we all benefit. Previously, this wasn't really possible. I'd like to believe that two years from now, the discussion of marketing the event will be not of where to market but a discussion of greater refinement in terms of marketing stategy.

We have, someplace, within our organization the appropriate expertise to provide some simple ideas to the organizing group to follow. In a country that provided most of the Jaguar sales, the biennial challenge should dwarf that of those like shows in the UK. Right now, we don't come close but, we have the potential to make a real media event with the right planning.

Submitted by jerry@moutons.org on Wed, 10/16/2002 - 00:00

Dennis, take look at this tech tip from the CW website:

http://www.coventrywest.com/tipofmonth3.htm

It will give a simple procedure for checking the fuel return flows from outside the car.

Our former Jag master tech (who spent his entire 30+ year wrenching career working only on Jags), like George, always changed all three fuel valves if one gave trouble. In his opinion, if one valve gave trouble the others weren't far behind and he found that doing this was the only way he could avoid comebacks when repairing this system.

Gregory Wells

Coventry West, Inc.

Submitted by warren.hansen@… on Wed, 10/16/2002 - 00:00

: I have a 1979 Xj6. When running on the right fuel tank, the left fuel

: tank would over fill and push fuel out of the vent on to the ground.

: I tested the left side fuel solenoid, in the return line, it was bad,

: and I replaced it. Now, when running on the left side tank, the gauge

: shows the right side tank loosing fuel and the left side tank gaining

: fuel. The new right side solenoid tests ok. The left side solenoid

: tests ok, and the three way tank select solenoid works properly when

: removed from the car and you blow/suck through it, both energized and

: not. The solenoids all are receiving voltage at the appropriate

: switch positions. Any suggestions?

David. The Tecalamit switches should be replaced in sets on a car of this age. It sounds like the selector valve is pulling from both tanks and returning to one. Change the two remaining ones and motor on. Good luck.